Every question on this topic with its answer, the working, and a full method: what the question is testing, the reason for each step, the mistakes that are easy to make and what they would give you, and the principle to take away.
Find the complete set of values of \(x\) for which \(2x^2 - 5x - 3 \geq 0\).
- A\(x \leq -\dfrac{1}{2}\) or \(x \geq 3\)
- B\(x \leq -\dfrac12\)
- C\(x \geq 3\)
- D\(x \leq -3\) or \(x \geq \dfrac{1}{2}\)
- E\(-3 \leq x \leq \dfrac12\)
- F\(-\dfrac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 3\)
- Factorise: \(2x^2 - 5x - 3 = (2x + 1)(x - 3)\).Two numbers multiplying to \(2 \times (-3) = -6\) and adding to \(-5\): \(-6\) and \(1\), so split \(-5x\) as \(-6x + x\).
- Roots: \(x = -\frac12\) and \(x = 3\).Set each bracket to zero.
- The coefficient of \(x^2\) is positive, so the parabola opens upwards and is \(\geq 0\) outside the roots.A quick sketch is the safest way to convert a factorisation into an inequality answer.
- Answer: \(x \leq -\frac12\) or \(x \geq 3\), with \(\leq\) because equality is allowed.The question has \(\geq 0\), so the roots themselves are included.
- Giving \(-\frac12 \leq x \leq 3\), which is where the expression is negative.
- Mixing up the roots as \(-3\) and \(\frac12\) - the root of \((2x+1)\) is \(-\frac12\), not \(-2\).
Find the set of values of \(x\) satisfying both \(3x - 7 < 2\) and \(x^2 > 4\).
- A\(x < -2\) or \(2 < x < 3\)
- B\(2 < x < 3\)
- C\(-2 < x < 3\)
- D\(x < 3\)
- E\(x > 2\)
- F\(x < -2\)
- Solve the linear one: \(3x - 7 < 2 \Rightarrow 3x < 9 \Rightarrow x < 3\).Dividing by a positive number leaves the inequality direction unchanged.
- Solve the quadratic one: \(x^2 > 4 \Rightarrow |x| > 2 \Rightarrow x < -2\) or \(x > 2\).\(x^2 > 4\) is satisfied by large positive and large negative \(x\) - taking only the positive branch is the classic error.
- Intersect the sets on a number line: from \(x < 3\), keep the parts of \(x < -2\) (all of it) and of \(x > 2\) (only up to \(3\)).'Both' means intersection; drawing both solution sets on a single line prevents mistakes.
- Answer: \(x < -2\) or \(2 < x < 3\).The answer is itself two intervals - a perfectly legitimate solution set.
- Dropping the branch \(x < -2\) and answering \(2 < x < 3\).
- Solving \(x^2 > 4\) as \(x > \pm 2\), which is not a meaningful statement.
The line \(y = x + k\) meets the circle \(x^2 + y^2 = 8\) at exactly one point. Find the possible values of \(k\).
- A\(k = \pm 2\sqrt{2}\)
- B\(k = \pm 8\)
- C\(k = \pm 4\)
- D\(k = \pm \sqrt{8}\)
- E\(k = 4\) only
- F\(k = \pm 2\)
- Substitute \(y = x + k\) into \(x^2 + y^2 = 8\): \(x^2 + (x + k)^2 = 8\).Eliminate \(y\) so the intersections are the roots of a quadratic in \(x\).
- Expand and collect: \(2x^2 + 2kx + (k^2 - 8) = 0\).\((x+k)^2 = x^2 + 2kx + k^2\), so the \(x^2\) terms combine to \(2x^2\).
- Exactly one point means one repeated root: discriminant \(= 0\), so \((2k)^2 - 4(2)(k^2 - 8) = 0\).Tangency is precisely the repeated-root case.
- Simplify: \(4k^2 - 8k^2 + 64 = 0 \Rightarrow -4k^2 = -64 \Rightarrow k^2 = 16 \Rightarrow k = \pm 4\).Two tangent lines exist - one on each side of the circle - so both signs are genuine.
- Answering \(k = \pm 2\sqrt2\) by confusing the radius \(\sqrt8\) with the intercept.
- Giving only \(k = 4\); the geometry guarantees a matching tangent with \(k = -4\).
For how many integers \(n\) is \(n^2 - 10n + 16 < 0\)?
- A\(5\)
- B\(3\)
- C\(4\)
- D\(8\)
- E\(7\)
- F\(6\)
- Factorise: \(n^2 - 10n + 16 = (n - 2)(n - 8)\).Two numbers multiplying to \(16\), adding to \(-10\): \(-2\) and \(-8\).
- Negative between the roots: \(2 < n < 8\).Upward parabola, so it dips below the axis strictly between its roots.
- List the integers strictly inside: \(3, 4, 5, 6, 7\) - five values.Strict inequality excludes \(2\) and \(8\), where the expression equals zero.
- Including the endpoints and answering \(7\).
- Counting \(8 - 2 = 6\) as the number of integers - the count between \(a\) and \(b\) exclusive is \(b - a - 1\).
Solve \(xy = 6\) and \(x - y = 1\). What is the sum of all possible values of \(x + y\)?
- A\(10\)
- B\(5\)
- C\(-5\)
- D\(7\)
- E\(1\)
- F\(0\)
- From \(x - y = 1\), write \(x = y + 1\).Substituting the linear equation keeps things to one variable.
- Substitute into \(xy = 6\): \((y + 1)y = 6 \Rightarrow y^2 + y - 6 = 0\).Expand before rearranging into standard form.
- Factorise: \((y + 3)(y - 2) = 0\), so \(y = -3\) or \(y = 2\).Both are valid - nothing in the question restricts the sign.
- Find the pairs: \(y = 2 \Rightarrow x = 3\), giving \(x + y = 5\); \(y = -3 \Rightarrow x = -2\), giving \(x + y = -5\). Sum of these: \(0\).The question asks for the sum of all possible values of \(x + y\), so compute \(x+y\) for each pair and add.
- Finding only the positive pair and answering \(5\).
- Adding all four numbers \(3 + 2 + (-2) + (-3)\) - which happens to be \(0\) too, but for the wrong reason; on another question that luck runs out.
The inequality \(x^2 + bx + 9 > 0\) holds for all real \(x\). Find the complete set of values of \(b\).
- A\(-3 < b < 3\)
- B\(b < -6\) or \(b > 6\)
- C\(b > 6\)
- D\(-6 < b < 6\)
- E\(b \geq 6\)
- Fall real \(b\)
- Note the leading coefficient is \(1 > 0\), so the parabola opens upwards.For \(>0\) everywhere you need both the right shape and no real roots; here the shape is automatic.
- Require no real roots: \(b^2 - 4(1)(9) < 0\).If there were real roots the curve would touch or cross the axis and the expression would fail to be positive there.
- Solve: \(b^2 < 36 \Rightarrow -6 < b < 6\).\(b^2 < 36\) means \(|b| < 6\), a single interval.
- Solving \(b^2 < 36\) as two outer intervals - that is the solution of \(b^2 > 36\).
- Using \(\leq\): at \(b = \pm6\) the curve touches the axis, where the expression equals \(0\) and is not \(> 0\).
The simultaneous equations \(y = x^2 + 2x + c\) and \(y = 4x + 1\) have exactly one solution. Find the value of \(c\).
- A\(3\)
- B\(-1\)
- C\(2\)
- D\(1\)
- E\(-2\)
- F\(0\)
- Set the expressions equal: \(x^2 + 2x + c = 4x + 1\).A simultaneous solution is a point where both \(y\)-values agree.
- Collect: \(x^2 - 2x + (c - 1) = 0\).Move everything to one side; the \(2x - 4x\) gives \(-2x\).
- Discriminant zero: \((-2)^2 - 4(1)(c - 1) = 0\).One solution means a repeated root.
- Solve: \(4 - 4c + 4 = 0 \Rightarrow 4c = 8 \Rightarrow c = 2\).Careful with \(-4(c-1) = -4c + 4\).
- Mishandling \(-4(c-1)\) and getting \(c = 0\).
- Setting the discriminant \(> 0\) ('has a solution') rather than \(= 0\) ('exactly one').
The curves \(y = x^2 - 4\) and \(y = -x^2 + 2x + k\) intersect at exactly two points. Find the complete set of values of \(k\).
- A\(k > \dfrac{9}{2}\)
- B\(k < -\dfrac{9}{2}\)
- C\(k > -\dfrac{9}{2}\)
- D\(k \neq -\dfrac92\)
- E\(k > -4\)
- Fall real \(k\)
- Set them equal: \(x^2 - 4 = -x^2 + 2x + k\).Intersections satisfy both equations, so their right-hand sides agree.
- Collect everything on one side: \(2x^2 - 2x - 4 - k = 0\).Note the \(-x^2\) becomes \(+x^2\) when moved across, giving \(2x^2\).
- Discriminant \(> 0\): \((-2)^2 - 4(2)(-4 - k) > 0\).Here \(c = -4 - k\); keeping the whole thing in brackets avoids sign errors.
- Simplify: \(4 + 32 + 8k > 0 \Rightarrow 8k > -36 \Rightarrow k > -\frac92\).\(-4 \times 2 \times (-4-k) = 32 + 8k\) - two negatives make a positive.
- Losing a sign in \(c = -4 - k\) and getting \(k > \frac92\) or \(k > -4\), both of which are offered.
- Forgetting to combine \(x^2\) with \(-(-x^2)\) and working with \(x^2\) instead of \(2x^2\).
Solve \(2x + 3y = 12\) and \(x^2 - y^2 = 0\). How many solutions \((x, y)\) are there?
- A\(0\)
- B\(2\)
- C\(1\)
- D\(4\)
- E\(3\)
- Finfinitely many
- Factorise: \(x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y) = 0\), so \(y = x\) or \(y = -x\).A product is zero when either factor is zero - this splits the problem into two straight-line cases.
- Case \(y = x\): \(2x + 3x = 12 \Rightarrow 5x = 12\), one solution \(\left(\frac{12}{5}, \frac{12}{5}\right)\).Substitute into the linear equation; a linear equation in one unknown has exactly one root.
- Case \(y = -x\): \(2x - 3x = 12 \Rightarrow -x = 12\), one solution \((-12, 12)\).Same method; the coefficient of \(x\) is non-zero so again exactly one solution.
- Total: two solutions.The two cases give different points, so no double counting.
- Taking the square root as \(y = x\) only, halving the answer.
- Concluding 'a line meets a quadratic in at most 2 points, so 2' without checking that neither case is parallel or degenerate.
Two numbers have sum \(10\) and the sum of their squares is \(58\). What is the positive difference between them?
- A\(3\)
- B\(4\)
- C\(6\)
- D\(1\)
- E\(2\)
- F\(8\)
- Use \((x - y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 - 2xy\) and \((x + y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy\).Adding these gives \((x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = 2(x^2 + y^2)\) - the relation that links all three given quantities.
- Rearrange: \((x - y)^2 = 2(x^2 + y^2) - (x + y)^2\).This avoids having to find \(xy\) as an intermediate step.
- Substitute: \(2(58) - 10^2 = 116 - 100 = 16\).Careful: it is \(2(x^2+y^2)\), not \(x^2 + y^2\).
- Take the positive square root: the difference is \(4\) (the numbers are \(3\) and \(7\)).The question asks for the positive difference, so take \(+4\).
- Forgetting the factor \(2\) and getting \((x-y)^2 = -42\), which is impossible.
- Giving \(16\) (the square of the difference) as the answer.
\(x\) is a real number. \(P\): '\(x^2 < 4\)'. \(Q\): '\(x < 2\)'. Which one of the following is true?
- AP is necessary and sufficient for Q.
- BP is necessary but not sufficient for Q.
- CP is sufficient but not necessary for Q.
- DP is neither necessary nor sufficient for Q.
- \(x^2<4\) means \(|x|<2\), i.e. \(-2A quadratic inequality of this shape gives an interval between the roots.Every \(x\) in \((-2,2)\) satisfies \(x<2\), so \(P \Rightarrow Q\): sufficient.\((-2,2)\) is contained in \((-\infty,2)\).Is it necessary? Take \(x=-5\): \(x<2\) holds but \(x^2 = 25 \not<4\). So \(Q \not\Rightarrow P\): not necessary.The larger set contains points outside the smaller one.So \(P\) is sufficient but not necessary.Whenever one solution set sits strictly inside another, the inner condition is sufficient but not necessary.Where it goes wrong
- Solving \(x^2<4\) as \(x<2\) and concluding the conditions are equivalent - that drops the lower bound.
- Solving it as \(x<-2\) or \(x>2\), which is the solution of \(x^2>4\).
Takeaway Compare conditions as sets: a subset is sufficient for the superset, the superset necessary for the subset.
Solve the simultaneous equations \(x + 2y = 7\) and \(x^2 + y^2 = 10\). Find the sum of the possible values of \(x\).
- A\(7\)
- B\(2\)
- C\(\dfrac{7}{5}\)
- D\(\dfrac{14}{5}\)
- E\(\dfrac{28}{5}\)
- F\(4\)
- Make \(x\) the subject of the linear equation: \(x = 7 - 2y\).Substitute the linear one into the quadratic, never the other way round - it keeps the algebra to one variable and one squaring.
- Substitute: \((7 - 2y)^2 + y^2 = 10\).Now a single quadratic in \(y\).
- Expand and tidy: \(49 - 28y + 4y^2 + y^2 = 10 \Rightarrow 5y^2 - 28y + 39 = 0\).\((7-2y)^2 = 49 - 28y + 4y^2\) - the cross term is \(2 \times 7 \times (-2y)\).
- Factorise: \((5y - 13)(y - 3) = 0\), so \(y = 3\) or \(y = \frac{13}{5}\).Check by expanding mentally: \(5y^2 - 15y - 13y + 39\). If factorising is awkward, use the formula.
- Back-substitute for \(x\): \(y = 3 \Rightarrow x = 1\); \(y = \frac{13}{5} \Rightarrow x = 7 - \frac{26}{5} = \frac95\). Sum \(= 1 + \frac95 = \frac{14}{5}\).Always return to the linear equation for the second variable - it cannot introduce extra solutions.
- Finding only one solution and answering \(1\) or \(\frac95\).
- Summing the \(y\)-values (\(3 + \frac{13}{5} = \frac{28}{5}\)) instead of the \(x\)-values - that wrong answer is offered.
Which of the following inequalities has exactly the same solution set as \(\dfrac{1}{x} > 2\)?
- A\(x > \dfrac{1}{2}\)
- B\(0 < x < \dfrac{1}{2}\)
- C\(x < \dfrac{1}{2}\)
- D\(x < 0\) or \(x > \dfrac12\)
- E\(x > 2\)
- F\(0 < x < 2\)
- Case \(x > 0\): multiplying by \(x\) keeps the direction, giving \(1 > 2x\), i.e. \(x < \frac12\). Combined with \(x > 0\): \(0 < x < \frac12\).Multiplying an inequality by a positive quantity is safe; the case assumption must be carried into the answer.
- Case \(x < 0\): then \(\frac1x < 0 < 2\), so the inequality can never hold.Rather than multiplying by a negative (and flipping), just observe the sign - a negative number is never greater than \(2\).
- Case \(x = 0\): \(\frac1x\) is undefined, so \(x = 0\) is excluded.Always check the value that breaks the expression.
- Combine: the solution set is exactly \(0 < x < \frac12\).Only the first case contributes.
- Multiplying through by \(x\) blindly to get \(x < \frac12\), which wrongly includes every negative number.
- Answering \(x > 2\) by 'inverting' both sides without justification.
Find the complete set of values of \(x\) for which \((x-1)(x-3)(x-5) > 0\).
- A\(1 < x < 3\) or \(x > 5\)
- B\(x > 5\)
- C\(1 < x < 5\)
- D\(x < 1\) or \(3 < x < 5\)
- E\(x > 1\)
- F\(x < 1\) or \(x > 5\)
- The roots are \(x = 1, 3, 5\); mark them on a number line, splitting it into four regions.A product of linear factors can only change sign at a root.
- Test the far-right region, e.g. \(x = 6\): \((5)(3)(1) > 0\).One test value fixes the whole chart; the far right is easiest because every factor is positive.
- Alternate leftwards: positive for \(x > 5\), negative on \((3,5)\), positive on \((1,3)\), negative for \(x < 1\).Each simple (unrepeated) root flips the sign exactly once.
- Collect the positive regions: \(1 < x < 3\) or \(x > 5\).The answer is a union of two intervals.
- Answering \(x > 5\) only, forgetting the middle positive region.
- Assuming the expression is positive whenever \(x\) is bigger than all the roots - true here, but the alternation is what you must use.
Given that \(|2x - 3| < 5\), which of the following statements is/are true?
- I\(-1 < x < 4\)
- II\(x^2 < 16\)
- III\(x > -1\)
- Anone of them
- BI only
- CII only
- DIII only
- EI and II only
- FI and III only
- GII and III only
- HI, II and III
- Unpack the modulus: \(|2x - 3| < 5\) means \(-5 < 2x - 3 < 5\).\(|A| < k\) means \(A\) lies within \(k\) of zero - a double inequality, not two separate cases.
- Solve the double inequality: add \(3\) throughout to get \(-2 < 2x < 8\), then halve: \(-1 < x < 4\). So I is true.Whatever you do to one part of a double inequality you do to all three parts.
- III says \(x > -1\), which is half of I. True.A weaker statement implied by a true one is automatically true.
- II: for \(-1 < x < 4\), the largest \(|x|\) can get is just under \(4\), so \(x^2 < 16\) always. True.For squares, what matters is the largest absolute value in the interval, not the largest value.
- All three hold.Match to the option list.
- Treating \(|2x-3| < 5\) as \(2x - 3 < 5\) only, losing the lower bound.
- Rejecting II by testing a value like \(x = -3\) that is not in the interval at all.
How many integers \(x\) satisfy \(x^2 < 5x + 24\) and \(x^2 > 3x\)?
- A\(4\)
- B\(8\)
- C\(5\)
- D\(7\)
- E\(6\)
- F\(9\)
- First: \(x^2 - 5x - 24 < 0 \Rightarrow (x - 8)(x + 3) < 0 \Rightarrow -3 < x < 8\).Between the roots for \(< 0\).
- Second: \(x^2 - 3x > 0 \Rightarrow x(x - 3) > 0 \Rightarrow x < 0\) or \(x > 3\).Roots \(0\) and \(3\); outside the roots for \(> 0\). Do not divide by \(x\) - that would lose the \(x<0\) branch.
- Intersect: from \((-3, 8)\) keep \((-3, 0)\) and \((3, 8)\).Overlap both solution sets on one number line.
- Count integers: \(-2, -1\) from the first piece and \(4, 5, 6, 7\) from the second: six.Endpoints \(-3, 0, 3, 8\) are all excluded by strict inequalities.
- Dividing \(x^2 > 3x\) by \(x\) to get \(x > 3\), losing all the negative solutions.
- Including \(0\) or \(3\) in the count.
The solution set of \(ax^2 + bx + c < 0\) (with \(a > 0\)) is \(-2 < x < 5\). What is the solution set of \(ax^2 - bx + c < 0\)?
- A\(-2 < x < 5\)
- B\(x < -5\) or \(x > 2\)
- C\(2 < x < 5\)
- D\(x < -2\) or \(x > 5\)
- E\(-5 < x < -2\)
- F\(-5 < x < 2\)
- Note that \(a(-x)^2 + b(-x) + c = ax^2 - bx + c\): the second expression is the first with \(x\) replaced by \(-x\).Spotting this makes the question a one-liner; the alternative is to reconstruct \(a\), \(b\), \(c\) explicitly.
- So the graph of the second is the reflection of the first in the \(y\)-axis.\(f(-x)\) is always the \(y\)-axis reflection of \(f(x)\).
- The original is negative on \(-2 < x < 5\); reflecting sends \(x\) to \(-x\), so the roots \(-2\) and \(5\) move to \(2\) and \(-5\).Every point of the solution set flips sign, and the interval flips with it.
- The new solution set is \(-5 < x < 2\).Write the interval with the smaller number first.
- Leaving the interval as \(2 < x < -5\), which is empty as written.
- Assuming the solution set is unchanged because 'only the sign of \(b\) changed'.
Find the complete set of values of \(x\) for which \(\dfrac{x-2}{x+1} \leq 0\).
- A\(-1 \leq x \leq 2\)
- B\(x < -1\) or \(x \geq 2\)
- C\(-1 < x \leq 2\)
- D\(x \leq 2\)
- E\(x \leq -1\) or \(x \geq 2\)
- F\(-2 \leq x < 1\)
- Find the critical values: numerator zero at \(x = 2\), denominator zero at \(x = -1\).The fraction can only change sign where the numerator or denominator vanishes.
- Test the three regions. For \(x < -1\) (say \(x = -2\)): \(\frac{-4}{-1} = 4 > 0\). For \(-1 < x < 2\) (say \(x = 0\)): \(\frac{-2}{1} = -2 < 0\). For \(x > 2\) (say \(x = 3\)): \(\frac{1}{4} > 0\).One test value per region settles the sign throughout that region.
- Include \(x = 2\) (the fraction is \(0\), and \(\leq 0\) allows it) but exclude \(x = -1\) (undefined).The two endpoints behave differently: a zero numerator is allowed by \(\leq\); a zero denominator never is.
- Answer: \(-1 < x \leq 2\).Note the mixed brackets - strict at \(-1\), inclusive at \(2\).
- Multiplying by \(x + 1\) to get \(x - 2 \leq 0\), i.e. \(x \leq 2\), which wrongly includes everything below \(-1\).
- Writing \(-1 \leq x \leq 2\) and including a value where the expression is undefined.
Consider the statement: for all real \(x\), if \(x > 2\) then \(x^2 - 3x + 2 > 0\). Which of the following is true?
- AThe statement is true, and so is its converse.
- BThe statement is true, but its converse is false.
- CThe statement is false, but its converse is true.
- DThe statement and its converse are both false.
- Factorise the quadratic: \(x^2 - 3x + 2 = (x-1)(x-2)\), which is positive exactly when \(x < 1\) or \(x > 2\).Knowing precisely where the expression is positive lets you test both directions quickly.
- The statement: does \(x > 2\) guarantee positivity? Yes - \(x > 2\) lies inside the region \(x > 2\). True.An implication is true when the hypothesis region sits inside the conclusion region.
- The converse: does positivity guarantee \(x > 2\)? No - \(x = 0\) gives \((0-1)(0-2) = 2 > 0\) but \(0 \not> 2\). False.The positivity region is strictly larger than \(x > 2\), so a counterexample must come from the extra part \(x < 1\).
- So the statement is true but its converse is false.Report both verdicts in the order the options use them.
- Assuming the converse holds because the implication does - converses are logically independent.
- Only testing values greater than \(2\), which can never refute the converse.